|
Post by Padres100 on Aug 26, 2014 17:13:36 GMT -5
Not even sure what to say, from the article I saw that the cards in the white pack BS were ONLY Inserts, but NOOOOOOOO They put base cards into it as well, and now that I go to read the damn article again heres what I see: THEY JUST STUCK THE BASE CARDS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LIST!! One pack and all I get is three s**t base and NO inserts when I thought I would ONLY get inserts. Just a bunch of BS
|
|
|
Post by coachnip13 on Aug 27, 2014 8:11:55 GMT -5
Yes, once again that is their fault.
|
|
|
Post by Padres100 on Aug 27, 2014 14:38:29 GMT -5
Yes, once again that is their fault. They could've stated the fact that there was base in the pack more clearly than just sticking it right in the middle of the list. So yes, it is their fault
|
|
|
Post by schmidty20 on Aug 27, 2014 14:52:13 GMT -5
Yes, once again that is their fault. They could've stated the fact that there was base in the pack more clearly than just sticking it right in the middle of the list. So yes, it is their fault Nope. They listed what was in the pack correctly. Nowhere did they contradict themselves by saying the pack contained 3 guranteed inserts.
|
|
|
Post by reggiecleveland on Aug 27, 2014 15:00:33 GMT -5
Yeah, I don't see a problem. If 15,000 coins is that big a deal to you, you should read the writing more carefully.
|
|
|
Post by paulypavilion on Aug 27, 2014 15:10:57 GMT -5
Yes, the covered their bases, but it really is weak to stick in the middle of the list like that. Its quite similar to players who slip in an insert with 8 commons hoping you don't notice that the 9th is a rare insert, particularly if the insert looks a lot like a base card.
We call those people scammers, is this that much different?
Again, not illegal, and they've done the bare minimum, but that's all they really did, and you know they were hoping lots of people would jump and buy them because at a quick glance they would think they were getting 3 guaranteed inserts.
|
|
|
Post by schmidty20 on Aug 27, 2014 15:23:56 GMT -5
Yes, the covered their bases, but it really is weak to stick in the middle of the list like that. Its quite similar to players who slip in an insert with 8 commons hoping you don't notice that the 9th is a rare insert, particularly if the insert looks a lot like a base card. We call those people scammers, is this that much different? Again, not illegal, and they've done the bare minimum, but that's all they really did, and you know they were hoping lots of people would jump and buy them because at a quick glance they would think they were getting 3 guaranteed inserts. I wouldn't call the black boost guys scammers. They're sending a trade that you shouldn't accept. They're only scammers if they CLAIM that you are only giving up 9 commons.
|
|
|
Post by dragontrip1 on Aug 27, 2014 15:52:22 GMT -5
Yes, the covered their bases, but it really is weak to stick in the middle of the list like that. Its quite similar to players who slip in an insert with 8 commons hoping you don't notice that the 9th is a rare insert, particularly if the insert looks a lot like a base card. We call those people scammers, is this that much different? Again, not illegal, and they've done the bare minimum, but that's all they really did, and you know they were hoping lots of people would jump and buy them because at a quick glance they would think they were getting 3 guaranteed inserts. I wouldn't call the black boost guys scammers. They're sending a trade that you shouldn't accept. They're only scammers if they CLAIM that you are only giving up 9 commons. No, they're scammers. My definition of a scammer is someone who tries to trick other people for their own benefit. And that's exactly what's happening.
|
|
|
Post by ctsoxfan on Aug 27, 2014 15:52:28 GMT -5
Yes, the covered their bases, but it really is weak to stick in the middle of the list like that. Its quite similar to players who slip in an insert with 8 commons hoping you don't notice that the 9th is a rare insert, particularly if the insert looks a lot like a base card. We call those people scammers, is this that much different? Again, not illegal, and they've done the bare minimum, but that's all they really did, and you know they were hoping lots of people would jump and buy them because at a quick glance they would think they were getting 3 guaranteed inserts. I wouldn't call the black boost guys scammers. They're sending a trade that you shouldn't accept. They're only scammers if they CLAIM that you are only giving up 9 commons. I have to disagree with you. Of course the intent is to make you think you are only giving up 9 commons, therefore they are scammers. You don't blame the victim of a crime, do you?
|
|
|
Post by dragontrip1 on Aug 27, 2014 15:55:13 GMT -5
And yeah, they didn't technically lie, but they could have at least put it at the top of the list or separate or something along those lines.
|
|
|
Post by Padres100 on Aug 27, 2014 16:17:19 GMT -5
Yes, the covered their bases, but it really is weak to stick in the middle of the list like that. Its quite similar to players who slip in an insert with 8 commons hoping you don't notice that the 9th is a rare insert, particularly if the insert looks a lot like a base card. We call those people scammers, is this that much different? Again, not illegal, and they've done the bare minimum, but that's all they really did, and you know they were hoping lots of people would jump and buy them because at a quick glance they would think they were getting 3 guaranteed inserts. Perfect analogy there. Thats a way you could look at it.
|
|
|
Post by coachnip13 on Aug 27, 2014 17:19:15 GMT -5
The entire article fit in one smartphone screenshot. It's not like it was as long as the iTunes user agreement. Put it this way: I'll bet it didn't take you long to find that line once you pulled that first gold card. It only appeared to be hidden because you were in such a rush to open packs.
|
|
|
Post by schmidty20 on Aug 27, 2014 22:41:07 GMT -5
They're not lying to you. I see a "scammer" as someone who lies to trick you into you losing something and the scammer gaining something.
If two people agree on a card sale through PayPal or a cross trade, and one person doesn't hold up his end of the bargain, then that's a scam. If someone offers you a crap trade, with no comment saying otherwise, then that is not a scam.
|
|
|
Post by Padres100 on Aug 27, 2014 23:00:05 GMT -5
The entire article fit in one smartphone screenshot. It's not like it was as long as the iTunes user agreement. Put it this way: I'll bet it didn't take you long to find that line once you pulled that first gold card. It only appeared to be hidden because you were in such a rush to open packs. Yeah when I saw an article titled "The Whte Pack is Back- ALL Available Inserts" My first thought is that the pack has All Available Inserts. Either way, my fault for not reading through the article before buying.
|
|