jamminj
Legend
I want some Super Rares for BUNT.
Posts: 2,901
Apps I Play: BUNT, HUDDLE, KICK
BUNT Username: JAMMINJ
HUDDLE Username: JAMMINJ
KICK Username: JAMMINJ
Most Wanted Cards: Weekly Inserts And Braves Cubs White Sox Red Sox Rangers and Cardinals cards. Also all arkansas boys- Lackey, Hunter, Burnett, etc
Huddle: I will take any cards but I love the Steelers and like the 49ers, Rams, Colts, Chiefs and Broncos.
Kick: Team USA, Man U and MLS cards.
Favorite MLB Team: Atlanta Braves
Favorite MLB Players: Craig Kimbrel
Favorite NFL Team: Pittsburgh Steelers
Favorite NFL Players: Ben Roethlisberger
Favorite Soccer Club: Chicago Fire
Favorite Soccer Player: Clint Dempsey
|
Post by jamminj on Aug 26, 2014 13:43:20 GMT -5
just for reference i only had to open 15 packs to get the golden ticket.
|
|
|
Post by samowamo on Aug 26, 2014 13:49:02 GMT -5
SHOW OFF!
|
|
|
Post by TylerFeth on Aug 26, 2014 14:04:20 GMT -5
Not to drag this on any longer, but I agree with Schmidty and GP's math.
Plus, it makes a ton more sense from a business standpoint to give each pack a 1:10,000 chance to contain your pass to the Topps Wonka Factory. If there were only 10k total packs, the most business savvy thing Topps could do, in that situation, would be to put a pack limit countdown on the Super Bonus Pack like they do with the Twitter pack. That pack would sell out in half an hour and the temptation to buy bundles and chase would be too much for most to resist. Knowing the Golden Ticket had to be pulled at some point in 10k packs, and seeing that there are only 4k packs left would cause a feeding frenzy of bundle buying and pack ripping.
Using the "each pack has a 1:10,000 chance of generating the 'right' number to get the Golden Ticket" formula, there's a much better chance that it will take >10,000 packs for the ticket to be pulled. Let's say Topps ran a game on the numbers and came up with an average of 16,000 packs for the ticket to be pulled. (The 16,000 is just an arbitrary number I chose for the sole reason that it's greater than 10k.) That 6000 additional packs would yield another 120,000,000 at 20k per pack. 120,000,000/500,000= 240 additional bundles of the 500k coin bundle. 240 bundles * $80 per bundle = $19,200. And that's the additional revenue for the cheapest bundle(unless 1M is in stock). Anybody buying lesser bundles just makes that number go higher.
If you wanna skip the math altogether and discuss why latter option is the more likely one used, just look at all the money chasing Topps has done so far this season and ask yourself "would they ever choose the option that would require less bundles to be purchased"?
|
|
|
Post by guineapirates on Aug 26, 2014 14:28:56 GMT -5
Not to drag this on any longer, but I agree with Schmidty and GP's math. Plus, it makes a ton more sense from a business standpoint to give each pack a 1:10,000 chance to contain your pass to the Topps Wonka Factory. If there were only 10k total packs, the most business savvy thing Topps could do, in that situation, would be to put a pack limit countdown on the Super Bonus Pack like they do with the Twitter pack. That pack would sell out in half an hour and the temptation to buy bundles and chase would be too much for most to resist. Knowing the Golden Ticket had to be pulled at some point in 10k packs, and seeing that there are only 4k packs left would cause a feeding frenzy of bundle buying and pack ripping. Using the "each pack has a 1:10,000 chance of generating the 'right' number to get the Golden Ticket" formula, there's a much better chance that it will take >10,000 packs for the ticket to be pulled. Let's say Topps ran a game on the numbers and came up with an average of 16,000 packs for the ticket to be pulled. (The 16,000 is just an arbitrary number I chose for the sole reason that it's greater than 10k.) That 6000 additional packs would yield another 120,000,000 at 20k per pack. 120,000,000/500,000= 240 additional bundles of the 500k coin bundle. 240 bundles * $80 per bundle = $19,200. And that's the additional revenue for the cheapest bundle(unless 1M is in stock). Anybody buying lesser bundles just makes that number go higher. If you wanna skip the math altogether and discuss why latter option is the more likely one used, just look at all the money chasing Topps has done so far this season and ask yourself "would they ever choose the option that would require less bundles to be purchased"? MATH!
|
|